Do you want to receive our legal analyses relating to current issues of climate change? Subscribe to our newsletter!
| An error in the definition of Delivering Party’s Replacement Cost (Emissions Trading Master Agreement for the EU Scheme version 3.0)? |
| Monday, 06 July 2009 10:29 |
|
It seems to be an error in the definition of Delivering Party’s Replacement Cost in the Emissions Trading Master Agreement for the EU Scheme version 3.0.
Namely, this definition refers to the point A(i), but in our opinion should refer to the amount calculated in accordance with point A – without additional “(i)”. This issue maybe matters not so much, but in so sophisticated and formalized master agreement as IETA is, can have some significance. The case relates to the interest. The above mentioned point A(i) provides for Contract Price and this provision – read literally – would lead to the conclusion of “excess of the Contract Price over the Contract Price”. That of course has no sense.
“[...] calculated on an amount equal to the product of the Default Quantity and an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the price determined pursuant to paragraph (A)(i) above over the Contract Price [...]”
It’s interesting, that that intention is written unambiguous in the simplified IETA master agreement designated for single trade - Single Trade Agreement version 4.0, 2008.
“calculated on the amount determined pursuant to paragraph A above”
www.emissions-euets.com This document may be freely used, copied and distributed on the condition, that each copy shall contain this copyright notice and the link to the source.
Add your comment |