|Why importers of electricity into EU don’t have compliance obligation under EUETS?|
|Monday, 11 July 2011 21:42|
Page 1 of 3
It is common knowledge that power producers in many countries outside the EU are not facing carbon constraints similar to those present under European Union Emissions Trading Scheme.
As a consequence, there are, however, investors that consider building power facilities outside the EU and importing electricity (provided technical and regulatory requirements allow). It seems that such a situation may be perceived as a regulatory gap that should be eliminated as quick as possible in order to avoid undermining the objectives of the revised EU ETS Directive.
Specifications to Invitation to the said tender (further referred to as ‘Specifications’) remind that - contrary to the situation prevailing in the first and second period of the EU ETS - as from 2013 power producers will have to buy allowances necessary to comply with the EU Emission Trading Scheme and the cost of emitting carbon will then turn into real production costs for electricity producers.
According to the Specifications, while power producers in the EU will act on a level playing field, this is not likely to be the case for power producers outside the EU not facing carbon constraints which translate into economic and business related considerations. The Specifications also observe that such electricity could, in theory, not only provide competitive advantages to their producers/suppliers arising from the absence of comparable carbon constraints, but may be perceived as carbon leakage from the production of electricity generation.
The degree of the threat at issue depends obviously on the interconnectors, but business analysis in some cases may justify even building new crossborder electricity transmission lines, in order to benefit from electricity imports generated outside the EU.
Even more dangerous to the integrity of the EUETS seem investments in electricity generation from renewable energy outside the EU, if - the electricity generated is to be supplied to the EU and - the country, where the investment is undertaken, is entitled to issue Certified Emission Reduction units (CER) under the UN Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), set up in order to stimulate, among other things, emission reductions in countries not subject to mitigation efforts under the Kyoto Protocol (for particulars see the original text of the Specifications).
What is the main concern in these remarks that just in June 2011 the study is commissioned to analyse the impact of full auctioning on the investment decision of power generators facing the option to invest inside or outside the EU with a view to supplying electricity for consumption in the EU.
Let's remind that the third trading period will begin in a one and a half year. I wonder when the Directive 2003/87/EC will be amended to capture electricity importers into EU as compliance entities. Power generators have the choice to build capacities for the supply of electricity to the EU inside or outside the EU and this seems to be the real threat to integrity of the EUETS. The sound and reliable assessment of the economic and microeconomic effects of full auctioning on the said investment decisions is really necessary.