Multilateral system (MiFID definitions)
Internal Electricity Market Glossary

 


 

 

Legal definition of the 'multilateral system' is laid down by Article 4(19) of the MiFID II Directive. Pursuant to this provision 'multilateral system' means any system or facility operated and/or managed by an investment firm or a market operator in which multiple third-party buying and selling trading interests in financial instruments are able to interact in the system. 

 

MiFID I does not use this definition. 

info

The characteristic feature of the MiFID II is the requirement that all multilateral systems for the trading of financial instruments are a regulated market, MTF or OTF operated by an authorised firm or a regulated market.

 

 

 

Multilateral versus bilateral systems

 

 

It is sometimes underlined, MiFID II has introduced this term in the opposition to 'bilateral systems'.

 

UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) in the document Financial Conduct Authority, Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II Implementation – Consultation Paper I (CP15/43), December 2015 observes: "Multilateral systems may be contrasted with 'bilateral systems' where an investment firm enters into every trade on own account. [...] Any system or platform is a multilateral system where more than one market participant has the ability to interact with more than one other market participant on that system or platform" (p. 264).

 

Article 4(19) MiFID II

  

'multilateral system' means any system or facility in which multiple third-party buying and selling trading interests in financial instruments are able to interact in the system

 

 

Article 1(7) of MiFID II requires all multilateral systems in financial instruments to operate as:

 

- a regulated markets, 

 

multilateral trading facilities (MTFs), or 

 

organised trading facilities (OTFs).

 

It means, the definition of the 'multilateral system' under MiFID II is common to any trading venue, a new type - OTF - including.

 

MiFID I provides for two types of trading venues only, regulated markets and MTFs, definitions thereof being very similar as sharing a number of features (in essence, both regulated markets and MTFs are systems which operate in accordance with non‑discretionary rules that bring together multiple buying and selling interests in a way that results in contracts).

 

Article 1(7) MiFID II

 

All multilateral systems in financial instruments shall operate either in accordance with the provisions of Title II concerning MTFs or OTFs or the provisions of Title III concerning regulated markets.

 

 

 

Constituent elements of the definition of 'multilateral systems' - the requirement for trading interests to interact in the system

 

 

FCA in the above Consultation Paper of December 2015 (p. 48, 49) also argues, the MiFID II definition of the 'multilateral system' does not require the conclusion of contracts under the system's rules but only that trading interest is able to interact in the system.

 

FCA interprets the effect of combined Articles 4(19) and 1(7) that the MiFID requirement that a contract is executed under the system's rules by means of the system's protocols is now a sufficient but not necessary condition to be a multilateral system and hence to be regulated as a trading venue.

 

Instead it is required that trading interest is able to interact in the system.

 

FCA is of the opinion that the condition for trading interests to interact in the system is less stringent than that a contract is executed under the system's rules, or by means of the system's protocols or internal operating procedures.

 

FCA is, furthermore, of the view that interaction in a system or facility occurs when the system or facility allows multiple trading interests to exchange information relevant to any of the essential terms of a transaction in financial instruments (being the price, quantity and subject‑matter) with a view to dealing in such instruments.

 

The information exchanged need not be complete contractual offers, but may be simply invitations to trade or 'indications of interest'.

 

In conclusion, pursuant to FCA, at a minimum, a platform will be considered a multilateral system (and hence must operate as a regulated market, MTF, or OTF in accordance with article 1(7) of MiFID II) if the system provides the ability for trading interests to interact with a view to dealing and:

 

- allows multiple participants to see such information about trading interest in financial instruments, or submit such information about trading interest in financial instruments for matching, and

 

- enables them, through technical systems or other facilities, to take steps to initiate a transaction, or be informed of a match.

 

MiFID II wording as well as the above FCA's analysis of the core, decisive elements of the very definition of the multilateral system indicates it is somewhat subtle concept, for example:

 

- a system that provides participants confirmation or notification messages about a matching opportunity between those participants, with a view to a transaction in financial instruments, qualifies as such a system or facility, 

 

- on the other hand any system that only receives, pools, aggregates and broadcasts indications of interest, bids and offers or prices is not considered a multilateral system for the purpose of MiFID II (this is because there is no reaction of one trading interest to another other within these systems – they do not 'act reciprocally' (see also recital 8 of MiFIR)).

 

In the FCA's view, interaction in a system or facility occurs when the system or facility allows trading interests to exchange information relevant to any of the essential terms of a transaction in financial instruments (being price, quantity, subject-matter).

 

The information exchanged need not be complete contractual offers, but may be simply invitations to treat or 'indications of interest'.

 

The FCA concludes that the definition of a multilateral system "goes beyond" the definitions of an OTF and MTF and of the systems operated by regulated markets.

 

 

Treatment for the portfolio compression and post-trade confirmation services

 

 

Pursuant to the aforementioned FCA's analysis, neither the service of portfolio compression, which reduces non-market risks in derivative portfolios without changing the market risk, nor post-trade confirmation services, constitutes a multilateral system by itself.

 

However, if a firm operates a system that comes within the definition of a multilateral system without taking into account these activities, any portfolio compression or post-trade confirmation services that it provides for that system can form part of the multilateral system that the firm is operating.

 

 

Add your comment

Your name:
Your website:
Comment:
Last Updated on Saturday, 04 March 2017 15:04
 

Search

Twitter
Copyright © 2009 - 2017 Michal Glowacki. All rights reserved.
The materials contained on this website are for general information purposes only and are subject to the disclaimer