|Approved Reporting Mechanism (ARM)|
|European Union Electricity Market Glossary|
Page 1 of 2
Approved Reporting Mechanism (ARM) means a person authorised under the provisions established in the MiFID II Directive to provide the service of reporting details of transactions to domestic competent authorities or ESMA on behalf of investment firms (Article (4)(1)(54) MiFID II).
An ARM is defined as an entity authorised to provide services to an investment firm in order for it to meet its reporting obligations under Article 26 MiFIR.
ARMs must have adequate policies and arrangements in place to report the information required under Article 26 MiFIR II as quickly as possible and no later than the close of the working day following the day upon which the transaction took place.
ESMA is mandated to develop regulatory technical standards on a number of issues regarding the obligation to report, including the data standards and formats in relation to these reports (Article 66(1) MiFID II).
Investment firms are required to make such reports and can either do so themselves or through an ARM.
MiFID II specifies a number of regulatory obligations that ARMs must comply with.
In particular, an ARM must operate and maintain effective administrative arrangements designed to prevent conflicts of interest with its clients.
An ARM that is also a market operator or investment firm must treat all information collected in a non-discriminatory fashion as well as operate and maintain appropriate arrangements to separate different business functions.
MiFID foresees that, in addition to reporting through ARMs, transaction reports can be sent by the regulated markets or multilateral trading facilities (MTFs) through whose systems the transaction was completed.
Important remarks on the confidentiality of the data held at an ARM contains Recital 13 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/571 of 2 June 2016 supplementing Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the authorisation, organisational requirements and the publication of transactions for data reporting services providers.
The said Recital clarifies as follows:
"An investment firm which has transaction reporting obligations, known as a 'reporting firm', may choose to use a third party to submit transaction reports on its behalf to an ARM, that is a 'submitting firm'. By virtue of its role the submitting firm will have access to the confidential information that it is submitting. However, the submitting firm should not be entitled to access any other data about the reporting firm or the reporting firm's transactions which are held at the ARM. Such data may relate to transaction reports which the reporting firm has submitted itself to the ARM or which it has sent to another important remarks on the of the submitting firm to send to the ARM. This data should not be accessible to the submitting firm as it may contain confidential information such as the identity of the reporting firm's clients."
The corresponding Article 9(2) of the said Regulation stipulates that where an investment firm (‘reporting firm’) uses a third party (‘submitting firm’) to submit information to an ARM on its behalf, an ARM must have procedures and arrangements in place to ensure that the submitting firm does not have access to any other information about or submitted by the reporting firm to the ARM which may have been sent by the reporting firm directly to the ARM or via another submitting firm.
The receiving firm in the case of a transmission of an order in accordance with Article 4 of the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/590 of 28 July 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the reporting of transactions to competent authorities should populate the specified information indicated in the table of fields in its own transaction report, should do this as part of its normal reporting and is not required to become an ARM (ESMA's Guidelines Transaction reporting, order record keeping and clock synchronisation under MiFID II, 10 October 2016, ESMA/2016/1452 (p. 22)).
Article 8(3) and (4) of the said Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/571 of 2 June 2016 requires an ARM to promptly notify the competent authority of its home Member State and any competent authority to whom the ARM submits transaction reports of any planned significant changes to the IT system prior to their implementation
Management of incomplete or potentially erroneous information by ARMs
An ARM is required to perform validation of the transaction reports against the requirements established under Article 26 of MiFIR for field, format and content of fields in accordance with Table 1 of Annex I to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/590 of 28 July 2016 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the reporting of transactions to competent authorities.
An ARM is, moreover, under the obligation to set up and maintain appropriate arrangements to identify transaction reports:
- that are incomplete or contain obvious errors caused by clients;
- which contain errors or omissions caused by that ARM itself.
Pursuant to Article 11 of the aforementioned Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/571 of 2 June 2016, there are different consequences envisioned for each of the above occurrences.
Errors caused by clients
Any corrections, including cancellations or amendments of transaction reports, that are not correcting errors or omissions caused by an ARM, may only be made at the request of a client and per transaction report.
Where an ARM cancels or amends a transaction report at the request of a client, it must provide this updated transaction report to the client.
Where an ARM, before submitting the transaction report, identifies an error or omission caused by a client, it must not submit that transaction report and is required to promptly notify the investment firm of the details of the error or omission to enable the client to submit a corrected set of information.
Errors or omissions caused by ARM itself
Where an ARM becomes aware of errors or omissions caused by the ARM itself, it must correct (including deleting or amending) such errors or omissions and promptly submit a correct and complete report.
Further, an ARM is required to promptly notify:
- the client of the details of the error or omission and provide an updated transaction report to the client,
- the competent authority of its home Member State and the competent authority to whom the ARM reported the transaction report about the error or omission.
The requirement to correct or cancel erroneous transaction reports or report omitted transactions does not extend to errors or omissions which occurred more than five years before the date that the ARM became aware of such errors or omissions.
|Last Updated on Wednesday, 28 June 2017 21:03|